Blog

What is an example of the third-person omniscient narrator in Steinbeck's book The Pearl?

An omniscient or third-person narrator is a voice that tells the story and that knows everything that happens in the story, beyond the knowledge of the characters. For example, when Kino and Juana bring their baby, Coyotito, to the doctor for his scorpion bite, the narrator tells the reader about the doctor: "The doctor had once for a short time been a part of the great world and his whole subsequent life was memory and longing for France" (page 12). This background about the doctor is something only an omniscient, or all-knowing, narrator would know--as it is not necessarily information that the characters who meet the doctor have.

The narrator also knows how news flows through the town before Kino and Juana do. For example, the narrator says:

"Before Kino and Juana and the other fishers had come to Kino's brush house, the nerves of the town were pulsing and vibrating with the news - Kino had found the Pearl of the World" (page 21).

The narrator has access to the way people are behaving about Kino's discovery of the pearl even before the characters do, as the narrator knows things beyond what the characters know. Many parts of the story are told by the omniscient narrator.

What one of the four big ideas in biology does Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers address?

Well, I assume you mean the big ideas of an AP Biology course; the answer I would choose is Systems or Energy, although the case could be made for all of them.

I say systems because death involves the entire body, top to bottom. Most of the chapters were concerned with how people use bodies. The first few chapters were about dissection and organ harvesting, like how systems of the body are separated at death for use in testing and research. Chapter three was about how the systems decompose after death; little had anything to do with the other topics of information or evolution. Medicinal uses of body parts and forensic research all seemed to fit the topic of systems.

I would say energy because the topic is death itself. The research on the mass of the soul and literal soul-searching was very concerned with how energy is stored in the body. In the second to last chapter, Roach considers using corpses as fertilizers, composts, and lamp fuel as an alternative to traditional fuels, and even before that discuses cannibalism throughout the world.

What is the net ionic equation for AgNO3 and KI?

We are looking for the net ionic equation for `AgNO_3` and `KI` . `AgNO_3` is silver nitrate and is soluble in water. `KI` is potassium iodide and is also soluble in water. If we mix aqueous solutions of both chemicals, silver iodide will form which is largely insoluble in water. The other ion pair, potassium nitrate, is also soluble in water. The total ionic equation is given below:

`Ag_(aq)^(+) + NO3_(aq)^(-) + K_(aq)^(+) + I_(aq)^(-)...

`Ag_(aq)^(+) + NO3_(aq)^(-) + K_(aq)^(+) + I_(aq)^(-) -gt AgI_(s) + K_(aq)^(+) + NO_3_(aq)^(-)`

The potassium and nitrate ions do not change over the course of the reaction so they are considered spectator ions. The net ionic equation eliminates these spectator ions and is given below:

`Aq_(aq)^(+) + I_(aq)^(-) -gt AgI_(s)`

In other words silver ions and iodide ions combine to form silver iodide as a solid.

What was the point that the author was trying to make in the book The Prince and The Pauper?

It would not be credible if a king and an adult pauper were to exchange clothes and identities in a story, but the principal characters in The Prince and the Pauper are just a couple of kids and do it as a prank on a whim. The Prince soon discovers that he is treated with extreme cruelty and hostility, while the Pauper discovers that he is treated with the greatest respect because everybody thinks he is the Prince and in line to be the next king. The moral of the novel is that most people are hypocritical and will treat you according to what they think you might be able to do for them.

Mark Twain became cynical about humanity as he aged. He shows this cynicism in works like "The Million Pound Bank Note" and "The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg," as well as in his great novel Huckleberry Finn. Mark Twain was once quoted as saying:

All that I care to know is that a man is a human being. That is enough for me; he can’t be any worse.

What did Mrs. Umney tell the Otis family about the bloodstain on the floor?

Mrs. Umney tells the Otis family how the bloodstain got there, how long it has been there, and how the bloodstain can't be removed.

Mrs. Umney tells the Otis family that the bloodstain has been in that very same spot ever since Sir Simon murdered his wife at that location in 1575. That means the bloodstain has been on the floor for more than 300 years. Mrs. Umney explains that the bloodstain has become a bit famous and people come to visit the Canterville Chase just to see the bloodstain. She also explains that the stain is impossible to remove.

"The bloodstain has been much admired by tourists and others, and cannot be removed."

Washington Otis thinks that last statement is entirely false. He claims that his special cleaner, Pinkerton's Champion Stain Remover and Paragon Detergent, will be able to clean the stain no problem. He immediately sets to work on the stain, and he is able to get rid of the stain completely.

"That is all nonsense," cried Washington Otis; "Pinkerton's Champion Stain Remover and Paragon Detergent will clean it up in no time," and before the terrified housekeeper could interfere, he had fallen upon his knees, and was rapidly scouring the floor with a small stick of what looked like a black cosmetic. In a few moments no trace of the bloodstain could be seen.

Unfortunately the stain returns by the next morning.

What is the historical background of the poem "A Doctor's Journal Entry for August 6, 1945" by Vikram Seth?

August 6, 1945, is the day that the first American atomic bomb was dropped over Hiroshima.

This bomb, nicknamed "Little Boy," was dropped upon Hiroshima. Later, the United States dropped a bomb over Nagasaki because the government of Japan refused to surrender unconditionally.

Vikram Seth's poem, "A Doctor's Journal Entry for August 6, 1945," which describes the horrors witnessed and endured by physicians when the atomic bomb falls, is ironically unassuming in tone. Even the...

August 6, 1945, is the day that the first American atomic bomb was dropped over Hiroshima.

This bomb, nicknamed "Little Boy," was dropped upon Hiroshima. Later, the United States dropped a bomb over Nagasaki because the government of Japan refused to surrender unconditionally.

The poem begins much like the Japanese haiku:

The morning stretched calm, beautiful and warm.
Sprawling half clad, I gazed out at the form
Of shimmering leaves and shadows.

Without warning, the doctor suddenly feels his skin burning and sees his blood; immediately, he frantically searches for his wife, only to find her also blood-soaked. They rush out and run down the street, but trip over a dead body that has been blown apart:

We fell tripped, by something at our feet,
I gasped out, when I saw it was a head;
Excuse me, please excuse me – He was dead.

Horrified, they push on toward the hospital until the doctor can go no farther, and he must sit down. He instructs his wife to continue to the hospital. When he regains some strength, he again walks and finds others, all stoically holding their arms out to avoid the pain of the raw flesh touching another body part. Yet,

Silence was common to us all. I heard
No cries of anguish, or a single word.

Despite this horrific event and the pain endured, the Japanese rebuilt Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While "A Doctor's Journal Entry for August 6, 1945" depicts the horrors of the bombing, it also implies what one critic calls "the moral nakedness" of those who could order and carry out this bombing.

What does Celia do with the wreath the speaker gave to her in Song: To Celia?

When Celia receives the wreath from the speaker, she breathes on it and then, instead of keeping it, sends it back to the speaker:

I sent thee late a rosy wreath,Not so much honoring thee,As giving hope that thereIt could not withered beBut thou thereto didst only breatheAnd sent it back to me;

If you interpret Celia's actions here on a literal level, you might think, "Okay, the speaker is...

When Celia receives the wreath from the speaker, she breathes on it and then, instead of keeping it, sends it back to the speaker:

I sent thee late a rosy wreath,
Not so much honoring thee,
As giving hope that there
It could not withered be
But thou thereto didst only breathe
And sent it back to me;

If you interpret Celia's actions here on a literal level, you might think, "Okay, the speaker is very much in love with her. So he sent her a wreath of roses as a gift and as an expression of love. She must not love him back, because she returned the gift. Someone who was glad to receive that gift would have thanked the speaker and then displayed the gift somewhere in the home."

However, as discussed , some readers see a bit more going on in this poem. Notice how the speaker says that he sends the wreath to Celia because "it could not withered be" in her presence, which hints that he believes she holds some kind of divine power over natural things. (He means that, somehow, the flowers in the wreath won't die if Celia is near them.) But then Celia breathes on the wreath ("But thou thereto didst only breathe") before sending it back to the speaker, and after that, the wreath not only smells like Celia but also somehow magically keeps on growing:

Since when it grows and smells, I swear,
Not of itself, but thee.

So, as you consider what Celia did with the wreath, instead of thinking that she just didn't want the gift, you might think that she imbued it with some kind of divine magic, then returned it to the speaker as a gift of her own.