What are a few moments of suspense in Agatha Christie's And Then There Were None?

In true Agatha Christie fashion, an air of mystery and suspense pervades And Then There Were None. One suspenseful event in the beginning of the novel occurs when the recording is played. After dinner at the isolated, luxurious mansion, a voice accuses each character in turn of murdering someone and not being punished for it.


After the first two deaths, the remaining characters realize that the set of ten little Indian figurines is missing...

In true Agatha Christie fashion, an air of mystery and suspense pervades And Then There Were None. One suspenseful event in the beginning of the novel occurs when the recording is played. After dinner at the isolated, luxurious mansion, a voice accuses each character in turn of murdering someone and not being punished for it.


After the first two deaths, the remaining characters realize that the set of ten little Indian figurines is missing the first two figures. Not only that, the first two figures died in similar fashion to their deceased housemates: choking (from poison) and oversleeping (overdosing on sleeping pills). This increases the suspense because each character faces the chilling idea that he or she is trapped on an island with a murderer who has carefully planned their death. As each character is eliminated, the tension mounts among those who remain.


The suspenseful climax of the book occurs when the (supposedly) last two characters left alive each believe the other is the killer. Vera grabs Lombard’s gun and kills him, then in turn kills herself with a noose that has been left waiting for her.

In the novel Lord of the Flies, what are some quotes that help the reader understand the characters Samneric?

Samneric are twins who are virtually inseparable throughout the novel. In Chapter 1, Ralph uses the conch shell to call the missing boys together on the island. The last two boys to arrive at the platform are the twins, Sam and Eric. Golding writes,


"They were twins, and the eye was shocked and incredulous at such cheery duplication. They breathed together, they grinned together, they were chunky and vital" (23).


Golding's initial portrayal of Sam...

Samneric are twins who are virtually inseparable throughout the novel. In Chapter 1, Ralph uses the conch shell to call the missing boys together on the island. The last two boys to arrive at the platform are the twins, Sam and Eric. Golding writes,



"They were twins, and the eye was shocked and incredulous at such cheery duplication. They breathed together, they grinned together, they were chunky and vital" (23).



Golding's initial portrayal of Sam and Eric remains unchanged throughout the novel as the twins are essentially considered one person.


In Chapter 6, the twins are supposed to be taking turns watching and feeding the fire, but they end up falling asleep because they do everything together. Golding writes,



"In theory one should have been asleep and one on watch. But they could never manage to do things sensibly if that meant acting independently, and since staying awake all night was impossible, they had both gone to sleep" (96).



Samneric are not considered intelligent, responsible, or independent. They do not follow through with taking turns and end up falling asleep during their duty.


After they return from the mountain, Ralph holds and assembly to discuss what Samneric saw on top of the mountain. While the twins are addressing the group, Golding writes,



"By custom now one conch did for both twins, for their substantial unity was recognized" (100).



Again, Samneric are considered one person and do not need to take turns using the conch shell to address the group.

Based on the molecular formula of water, H2O, work out the valencies of hydrogen and oxygen.

The guiding principle for determining valency is the Octet Rule. This states that all atoms will prefer to have a full valency shell. In practice, this doesn't always mean there must be eight electrons, and with only the molecular formula to work with, we have to incorporate a little of our own background knowledge of oxygen and hydrogen. Practically speaking, it's much more straightforward to use the periodic table and know what the ground state...

The guiding principle for determining valency is the Octet Rule. This states that all atoms will prefer to have a full valency shell. In practice, this doesn't always mean there must be eight electrons, and with only the molecular formula to work with, we have to incorporate a little of our own background knowledge of oxygen and hydrogen. Practically speaking, it's much more straightforward to use the periodic table and know what the ground state valency for each element is before you start.


We know there are two hydrogens bound to the oxygen atom, which means there must be at least a single bond in each case (we would need more than the molecular formula if there were double or triple bonds). Each single bond provides one extra electron, so we know this provides two electrons to the oxygen in total. If these two electrons satisfy the Octet Rule, then the oxygen is happy and its valency must be 6. Likewise, the hydrogens must have a valency of one because we know there's one bond and they only have one electron to provide. Another key piece of information is that the entire molecule is shown with a neutral charge, which means all the atoms are either in their ground states or there is an equal number of protons and electrons in the molecule.

How is Liesel's stealing of a second book a pivotal point in what is to come in The Book Thief by Markus Zusak?

The section entitled "A Girl Made of Darkness" is found in Part Two of Zusak's The Book Thief. It gives an explanation of events that occur after Liesel steals her second book at the Furor's birthday bonfire. Two major events happen as a result of Liesel's thievery: the mayor's wife, Ilsa Hermann, witnesses the crime; and when Hans Hubermann discovers the stolen book, he gets an idea that will help to save a Jew's...

The section entitled "A Girl Made of Darkness" is found in Part Two of Zusak's The Book Thief. It gives an explanation of events that occur after Liesel steals her second book at the Furor's birthday bonfire. Two major events happen as a result of Liesel's thievery: the mayor's wife, Ilsa Hermann, witnesses the crime; and when Hans Hubermann discovers the stolen book, he gets an idea that will help to save a Jew's life. The narrator explains it as follows:



The act of stealing it triggered the crux of what was to come. It would provide her (Liesel) with a venue for continued book thievery. It would inspire Hans Hubermann to come up with a plan to help the Jewish fist fighter. And it would show me, once again, that one opportunity leads directly to another (83).



The "venue for continued book thievery" refers to Ilsa Hermann's private library. Because Frau Hermann sees Liesel steal a book from the bonfire, she later invites the girl to visit her library and read her books. Unfortunately, after Frau Hermann stops employing Liesel's mother to wash her laundry, Liesel screams at her and eventually resorts to stealing books from the Hermanns' library. The relationship between Frau Hermann and Liesel doesn't end there, though. If Frau Hermann had not seen Liesel take the book that day, then she never would have invited her to her house to read. If Liesel had never read in Frau Hermann's library, she might not have developed a relationship with her. Because Frau Hermann and Liesel develop a relationship in the library, the mayor's wife eventually takes Liesel into her home after the Hubermanns die.


As far as Hans Hubermann's "plan to help the Jewish fist fighter" is concerned, the stolen book from the bonfire gives him the idea that Max Vandenburg would probably be able to travel to Himmel Street undetected as a Jew if he were always found by people reading Mein Kampf—Hitler's autobiography. This book was required reading material for Nazi supporters; therefore, if Max were found reading the book while he traveled to the Hubermann's house, then he might just make it there alive. The plan works, and Liesel is blessed to enjoy Max's company and to build a loving friendship with him that continues after the war.

How do I write a compound sentence?

Compound sentences simply involve putting together (or "compounding") two sentences with a comma and a joining word (or "coordinating conjunction"). Coordinating conjunctions include and, but, or, for, nor, yet, and so. One of the key parts of understanding compound sentences is knowing that the pieces must be able to stand on their own as independent clauses.


Be careful: Just because you see a comma and a coordinating conjunction doesn't mean the sentence is a...

Compound sentences simply involve putting together (or "compounding") two sentences with a comma and a joining word (or "coordinating conjunction"). Coordinating conjunctions include and, but, or, for, nor, yet, and so. One of the key parts of understanding compound sentences is knowing that the pieces must be able to stand on their own as independent clauses.


Be careful: Just because you see a comma and a coordinating conjunction doesn't mean the sentence is a compound sentence. For example, "Simon is playing Pokemon, and having a lot of fun" is not a compound sentence. Why not? Because "having a lot of fun" is not an independent clause, and the comma technically shouldn't be there (though very casual writers sometimes add one). The correct version of this as a compound sentence would be:



Simon is playing Pokemon, and he is having a lot of fun. 



Let's consider some other examples of compound sentences:



Alice wants to get ice cream at Dairy Queen, but she is lactose intolerant. 


Gordon is busy with work, so I went to dinner with Victoria instead.


We will go see Batman v. Superman tonight, or we will stay at home and watch Netflix.


Does Hayden Christensen love Natalie Portman?

Natalie Portman began her acting career in the short film Developing. She was just 13 when that short film was released. She filmed many movies before becoming an adult. Her busy acting career and Harvard education certainly would have impacted the time she had for dating.


The pair are rumored to have dated during Star Wars. When Star Wars: Episode 1 - The Phantom Menacestarted filming in 1997, Portman was only 16. She was...

Natalie Portman began her acting career in the short film Developing. She was just 13 when that short film was released. She filmed many movies before becoming an adult. Her busy acting career and Harvard education certainly would have impacted the time she had for dating.


The pair are rumored to have dated during Star Wars. When Star Wars: Episode 1 - The Phantom Menace started filming in 1997, Portman was only 16. She was 19 when the second movie was filmed, and she was allegedly dating Christensen when the first movie was released. At that point, she was also enrolled in college and working towards her degree in psychology from Harvard. Hayden Christensen is not the only actor she's rumored to have dated before her later marriage. MTV also says she dated Jude Law and Sean Penn. 


In 2010, Portman became engaged to Benjamin Millepied, her choregrapher in Black Swan. She gave birth to their son, Aleph, in 2011, and the couple married in 2012.


What is a description of Antonio from Merchant of Venice?

A figure of romance, Antonio is a patrician of the fabulous city of Venice and a successful merchant. His friends perceive poetry in his extensive commercial ventures:


      ...your argosies with portly said--
Like signiors and rich burghers on the flood,
Or as it were the pageants of the sea--
Do overpeer the petty traffickers 
That cursy to them, do them reverence,
As they fly by them with their woven wings. (1.1.9-14)



He also loans money interest free to people and helps some escape from their debts to Shylock. Because he does so, he incurs the animosity of the usurer Shylock. 


Antonio and Bassanio's friendship is a very strong relationship. While this relationship is often considered homoerotic in modern interpretations, in Shakespeare's time, just as it was even during the 19th century [Henry Clerval and Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein], male friendships were considered the highest and purest forms of love because they were spiritual and cerebral without eroticism.
Because the two men are so close, Antonio suffers from an undefined melancholy and presentiment [another thing Elizabethans strongly believed in], and it is not until later that he learns his dear friend's plight: Bassanio does not have the money to court the beautiful heiress, Portia, with whom he has fallen in love.
So, Antonio, who would do anything for his friend, agrees to lend Bassanio the money he needs. However, since his ships have not yet returned, Antonio does not have the ready money; consequently, he decides to borrow the needed three thousand ducats from Shylock, a man whom he loathes, having even kicked him out of his place of business. Confident that his ships will soon return, Antonio agrees to Shylock's loan and its terms, dictated by Shylock's greed and hatred for Antonio.


When Antonio's ships are lost at sea, he fears that he will have to give up a pound of flesh, but a disguised Portia saves him by pointing out that there is nothing in the agreement that includes blood; the agreement says explicitly "a pound of flesh" only. So Shylock must extract the flesh without making Antonio bleed--an impossibility. Antonio is saved.

Is becoming a lawyer a good idea? I'm really keen on studying law once I've finished high school, but I don't know if it's a good idea or not.

No one career is either good or bad for everyone. Whether a particular career is a good fit for you depends on your skills and interests. 


The first thing about becoming a lawyer is that it takes a long time. You would need to complete a four-year undergraduate degree followed by three years of law school. It can also be quite an expensive undertaking; many law schools can cost over $150,000 for a three-year program,...

No one career is either good or bad for everyone. Whether a particular career is a good fit for you depends on your skills and interests. 


The first thing about becoming a lawyer is that it takes a long time. You would need to complete a four-year undergraduate degree followed by three years of law school. It can also be quite an expensive undertaking; many law schools can cost over $150,000 for a three-year program, as you can see using a law school cost calculator. In general, admission to law school requires an undergraduate GPA of 3.8 or above and good scores on the LSAT exam. 


If you are a good student who enjoys analytical thinking, writing, and extensive reading, law might be a good career choice. However, it might be best to choose an undergraduate major that would prepare you for a broad range of careers, but which includes several courses in writing, oral communication, and logical reasoning, all essential skills for lawyers. Among the most highly recommended undergraduate majors for aspiring law students are history, English, politics, philosophy, and economics. 


As you are just finishing high school, you have a few years before you need to decide whether to apply to law school. A good strategy might be trying to find a summer internship at a law office to see what lawyers actually do during their work days so you can decide whether it is a career you would enjoy. 


How can the management of quality contribute to competitive advantage?

The question asks how the management of quality can contribute to competitive advantage. Of course, having a product or service superior in quality to one’s competition is likely to drive increased sales and the ability to charge higher prices. The question asks about the management of quality, however. By this, we mean the approaches employed to specifically measure what aspects constitute quality and to manage processes so as to reliably replicate those product or service...

The question asks how the management of quality can contribute to competitive advantage. Of course, having a product or service superior in quality to one’s competition is likely to drive increased sales and the ability to charge higher prices. The question asks about the management of quality, however. By this, we mean the approaches employed to specifically measure what aspects constitute quality and to manage processes so as to reliably replicate those product or service metrics. 


The primary concept applicable to this is TQM or Total Quality Management. As a methodology, this achieved definition and general acceptance in the 1950’s. It is based on the ideas that: 



  1. Quality is measurable by means of defining what features are desired in a product or service and defining metrics for those features.




  2. Quality is reproducible; the inputs and processes which produce quality can be defined and controlled.




  3. Quality is a result of the combined action of the entire firm and the business ecosystem in which it operates, most importantly its supply chain, so managing it must take this ecosystem into account.



 That being said, effective management of quality provides a firm with advantage over its competitors in two ways. First, it makes its product features reliable, so that the firm’s customers know exactly what to expect from each purchase. Second, it defines exactly the causes of specific quality outcomes, so that sources of inconsistency may be identified and eliminated, and so that improvements to quality can be made.


The sites referenced below provide more in-depth material on TQM and associated management practices.

How can I get started writing an ethnographic field study paper?

When writing a paper of any sort, it's best to focus on a subject that interests you, but I would argue it is even more important when writing an ethnography. Ask yourself: what am I interested in? Throughout history, ethnography was largely limited to comparing, contrasting, and describing the unique histories and life-ways of distinct ethnic groups. With shifting attitudes and frameworks in Anthropology, you could really write an ethnography-style paper on any portion of a society in the world. Throughout my own work in anthropology, I have encountered students who focused on sports culture or gender roles in a specific context. Even if your professor hasn't introduced you to any ethnic or cultural material that interests you, perhaps you could write on a group that is not necessarily defined by ethnicity. Please check with your professor as to whether this would be permissible. 

Don't feel pressured to know which one, single group you want to write about straight off the bat! Try making a short list of up to five groups you might be interested in studying. Consider the following to brainstorm some possibilities:


  • What do you already know about the group?

  • What do you want to know about this group?

  • How do you relate to this group?

  • Why are you interested in this group?

I would wager that whichever possible group gets you writing the most in trying to answer these questions would be the one you should choose for your assignment. However, I also recommend that you do some very basic research on your possible choices. This is why it's important to keep your list of possibilities small; you do not want to overwhelm yourself in this basic research. 


Most works of ethnography include information about worldviews, religions, or belief systems, as well as subsistence practices, gender roles, history, language, and art. If you do not choose a distinct ethnic group, you may not need to include some of this information. If you choose a group considered to be a sub-set or portion of society, try to include some particular information about what makes them distinctive. For example, if you were to write about English football hooligans as a distinct group, it would probably not be necessary to talk about their religious views. On the other hand, it would be very important to discuss the roles of football, class, music, and gender in their lives. 


If you have the opportunity to observe your chosen group in-person, try to keep this portion of your project simple. Just sit back, watch, and take notes as appropriate. Try to digest the experience through careful observation and draw connections later. If you try too hard to "look for" something during your observation period, you might miss other information.


I will include some links below that I hope you will find useful in your research. Several of these databases include primary source material from fieldwork around the globe. 

What are the themes in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban?

There are many themes present within J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, many of which address and critique real human and social issues.


One of the most prominent themes is that of the failings of legal systems across the world to effectively and justly deal with those who have been accused of a crime. One of the tenants of the modern justice system is that an individual is innocent until...

There are many themes present within J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, many of which address and critique real human and social issues.


One of the most prominent themes is that of the failings of legal systems across the world to effectively and justly deal with those who have been accused of a crime. One of the tenants of the modern justice system is that an individual is innocent until proven guilty; however, within the book, we see both people and creatures suffer time and time again for crimes they did not commit. Buckbeak is sentenced to death after attacking Malfoy, despite the fact that the animal was provoked by Malfoy's malicious spirit. Sirius Black is locked away in Azkaban and tormented by Dementors, despite being innocent of the crime he has allegedly committed, mainly for the sake of the Ministry appearing tough on crime. Even Ron and Hermione's friendship suffers when Ron rashly and incorrectly accuses Hermione's cat, Crookshanks, of eating his rat, Scabbers. Meanwhile, those who actually guilty of horrible acts continue to walk free throughout the wizarding world: Peter Pettigrew, Lucius Malfoy, etc. Clearly, these are all huge miscarriages of justice.


The book also examines the duality of our world, where not everything is always as it seems (demonstrated by Hermione's use of the Time-Turner) and the role that betrayal and loyalty plays in human relationships (brought to light by the revelation that Pettigrew had betrayed Harry's parents, leading to their untimely death). 

What is the most important choice a character makes in Mark Twain's The Prince and the Pauper? Why does the character make that choice?

There's a mutual choice that's the most important for the story to happen at all, and that is that the two boys change clothes and positions.


If you really want the most important choice by a single character, it would be the choice to read, which is Tom's choice. This is described in Chapter 2, where Twain writes, "He often read the priest's old books and got him to explain and enlarge upon them. His...

There's a mutual choice that's the most important for the story to happen at all, and that is that the two boys change clothes and positions.


If you really want the most important choice by a single character, it would be the choice to read, which is Tom's choice. This is described in Chapter 2, where Twain writes, "He often read the priest's old books and got him to explain and enlarge upon them. His dreamings and readings worked certain changes in him, by-and-by."


As far as why he did this, there are several reasons. The first is, of course, that he was a poor beggar boy. His actual day-to-day life has little going for it, so he reads to escape his reality. He is open to reading because Father Andrew tells him stories to make him feel better and entertain him—and he did this because Tom was a poor beggar.


This was the most important choice because it starts the change in Tom. He moves from being passive to being active, and he reshapes the beggar world around him into a royal court.


This sets up the later plot in which the boys change places.

What does "My Son, The Fanatic" by Hanif Kureishi mean as a story?

One of the meanings within Kurieshi's "My Son, the Fanatic" is its indictment of fanaticism.


Even though published in 1994, Kurieshi's story speaks to a reality with which the world is struggling today. The issue of so-called "radicalized" youth concerns many people in our world today.  "My Son, the Fanatic" insists that when we encounter that which is different, we must try to understand it.  While our reactions might embrace courses of action that eliminate...

One of the meanings within Kurieshi's "My Son, the Fanatic" is its indictment of fanaticism.


Even though published in 1994, Kurieshi's story speaks to a reality with which the world is struggling today. The issue of so-called "radicalized" youth concerns many people in our world today.  "My Son, the Fanatic" insists that when we encounter that which is different, we must try to understand it.  While our reactions might embrace courses of action that eliminate dialogue, the story reminds us that such knee-jerk reactions should be avoided.


Parvez's problem is that he cannot communicate with his son.  Ali's desire to maintain a passionate embrace of Islam is something that Parvez could have echoed. Instead of being offended and dwelling on his own hurt, Parvez could have shown greater acceptance towards his son. For example, Parvez could have accompanied Ali to the mosque or spoken with leaders of the religious community to whom Ali has declared allegiance.  Dialogue and understanding is replaced with misunderstanding and a lack of trust.  Kurieshi's story equates fanaticism with silencing discussion. When Ali refuses to hear Bettina or his father, it is just as much a form of fanaticism as when Parvez beats his son.  The story's powerful meaning is emphasized in its ending, where no one wins in a world of fanaticism.


The story is very relevant to our world today.  Its meaning reminds us how fanatical displays of violence will not solve any of our problems.  Such paths lead to more disdain, resentment, and future fanatical displays. The story insists that communication is the only way to understand something different and embrace it as a part of our world. Youth like Ali are lost because they do not feel they are being heard.  This reality is addressed in Kurieshi's story and what we experience today.  Looking at Parvez's example and figuring out how to do things better is the ultimate meaning of the story.  It is a message that is more relevant today than ever before.

Describe "group think" and its implications for health care organizations.

Group think is the process in which a group of individuals largely foregoes independent or creative thought when presented with a problem and instead relies on conventional wisdom to resolve—or potentially never resolve—a problem. 


The implications of group think on the health care field are obvious. If a health care professional fails to think outside of the box or use new problem-solving skills, then answers to some of the most complicated medical problems of our...

Group think is the process in which a group of individuals largely foregoes independent or creative thought when presented with a problem and instead relies on conventional wisdom to resolve—or potentially never resolve—a problem. 


The implications of group think on the health care field are obvious. If a health care professional fails to think outside of the box or use new problem-solving skills, then answers to some of the most complicated medical problems of our day will never be resolved. Many of the remedies and vaccinations available now are thanks to individuals who fought against the idea of group think and instead sought new ways to find solutions to problems.


In some instances, group think can be looked at as a positive thing in the health care field, but this is only true when the it is used to help organize a group around a common goal or efficient solution to a problem. An example of this could be the uniting of a group of nurses to resolve to treat patients in an efficient and effective way.

What is the "battle" in "Range-finding" by Robert Frost?

Robert Frost's poem "Range-finding" is about a stray bullet from a battle that, on the way to its target, travels through nature. The poem begins, "The battle rent a cobweb diamond-strung / And cut a flower beside a ground bird's nest / Before it stained a single human breast." The "battle" could be any military conflict, but as the poem was written in 1916, it is most likely a battle that takes place during World...

Robert Frost's poem "Range-finding" is about a stray bullet from a battle that, on the way to its target, travels through nature. The poem begins, "The battle rent a cobweb diamond-strung / And cut a flower beside a ground bird's nest / Before it stained a single human breast." The "battle" could be any military conflict, but as the poem was written in 1916, it is most likely a battle that takes place during World War I. In the poem, a bullet from the battle tears a cobweb and cuts a flower on its way to lodge itself in a human chest. The flower droops over, but a bird goes on visiting its young. The poem is about the ways in which events in the human world--in this case, a battle--affect the natural world. It is also about the ways war causes collateral damage--in other words, damage that is not the war's original target. This was very relevant at the time Frost wrote the poem, as World War I caused a great deal of collateral damage and hurt civilians as well as soldiers. 

In The Hunger Games, is the decision to enter your name more times in exchange for more tesserae morally correct?

I believe the decision to enter a name into the "raffle" more times in exchange for additional tesserae is morally correct; however, I believe the system that created such a process is morally suspect.  


Katniss explains to readers in chapter one how the tesserae process works.  


Say you are poor and starving as we were. You can opt to add your name more times in exchange for tesserae. Each tessera is worth a...

I believe the decision to enter a name into the "raffle" more times in exchange for additional tesserae is morally correct; however, I believe the system that created such a process is morally suspect.  


Katniss explains to readers in chapter one how the tesserae process works.  



Say you are poor and starving as we were. You can opt to add your name more times in exchange for tesserae. Each tessera is worth a meager year's supply of grain and oil for one person. You may do this for each of your family members as well. So, at the age of twelve, I had my name entered four times. Once, because I had to, and three times for tesserae for grain and oil for myself, Prim, and my mother.



In other words, if you want more food for your family, you have to apply for the reaping more times. It's a straightforward risk vs. reward decision. I don't see that as being morally wrong, especially when it is done for survival. Katniss can get a lot more food and oil for her family, but her risk of being chosen for the Hunger Games is now higher. 


do think the entire system is corrupt, though. Katniss is operating within the rules of the system for the welfare of her family, but the system is lopsided. It practically guarantees children from poor families will always be selected in the reaping. Poor families need the tesserae; therefore, a person from a poor family is more likely to have his or her name in the reaping selection more times than a person from a wealthy family. This means a person from a poor family is statistically more likely to be selected for The Hunger Games. I think inherently unfair systems like that are morally corrupt.  

What is the theme and purpose of the story "Royal Beatings" by Alice Munro?

The theme of "Royal Beatings," a complex story with multiple shifts in time (as Rose looks back many years later on her childhood), is the cruelty lurking beneath the surface in relationships and the way that cruelty can come to the surface so quickly. At the end of the story, Flo, Rose's stepmother, administers a "royal beating" to Rose on a Saturday when Flo can't go to town. Munro writes of Flo's emotions that day,...

The theme of "Royal Beatings," a complex story with multiple shifts in time (as Rose looks back many years later on her childhood), is the cruelty lurking beneath the surface in relationships and the way that cruelty can come to the surface so quickly. At the end of the story, Flo, Rose's stepmother, administers a "royal beating" to Rose on a Saturday when Flo can't go to town. Munro writes of Flo's emotions that day, "The wrangle with Rose has already commenced, has been going on forever, like a dream that goes back and back into other dreams." Flo's reasons for beating Rose seem to arise partly out of her own frustration, with her restive feelings in early spring and her anger over customers' unpaid bills, but Flo's rage also seems to arise almost out of her unconscious, like a dream. The story recounts the horrific yet mundane ritual in which Flo asks Rose's father to beat Rose and then makes up for the beating with a tray of delicious and lovingly prepared foods.


In a similar way, the story tells about the senseless beating the butcher, Tyde, receives from young men in the town because they hear the rumor he impregnated his daughter, who is deformed from having had polio. They beat and whip him until his night clothes and the snow around him turn red, and he dies shortly thereafter. The men in town are moved to extreme violence by the whisperings of a rumor, which is almost definitely false. A year after they are convicted, the young men who carried out the beating are set free.


The purpose of this story is to reveal the violence that lurks behind the surface of ordinary lives and the ways people use violence to vent their own frustrations. Flo vents her frustrations on Rose, yet she clearly also loves her stepdaughter; the "useless young men" in town beat the butcher, even though they don't even particularly care what he did with his family. People resort to beatings and violence with little provocation or reason.

Do you see any conflict between your desire to be as profitable as possible and your desire to pay employees a living wage?

There is not a conflict between earning potential and paying employees.  When examining the ethical implications of overhead, the moral choice should be determined prior to payment.  The moral choice to pay employees an established salary overrides any contentions of earning potential conflict. 


In simple terms, it would unethical to pay employees less than a "living wage."  Therefore being as profitable as possible includes that wage as standard.  It would not be possible to be...

There is not a conflict between earning potential and paying employees.  When examining the ethical implications of overhead, the moral choice should be determined prior to payment.  The moral choice to pay employees an established salary overrides any contentions of earning potential conflict. 


In simple terms, it would unethical to pay employees less than a "living wage."  Therefore being as profitable as possible includes that wage as standard.  It would not be possible to be more profitable, because it would violate a moral standard already established.  This argument relies on the assumption the organization has established a moral standard of operation.  When such a standard is set, then all decisions must conform to it, which eliminates conflict.


If an organization does not set a moral standard, then there cannot be a conflict because there is no standard for comparison.  An organization that maximizes profit over worker pay has determined the moral implications do not factor into the decision-making process.  Therefore, no conflict exists because the company has made its intentions plain.


Conflict will only arise when there is a disparity between what the organization has stated or agreed to do and its actions.  If the company has made the moral choice to pay workers a "living wage" but is underpaying them to maximize profit, then the company is violating its moral obligation.  Since the organization is in violation of a moral foundation, profits should be reduced to erase the conflict and everyone involved should be in agreement to make that happen.

Where is Mai in the first chapter of "Monkey Bridge" by Lan Cao?

In the first chapter of Monkey Bridge, Mai is at Arlington Hospital in Virginia, three years after leaving Saigon. The year is 1978, and Mai's mother, Thanh, is recuperating from a stroke; Thanh is a patient at the hospital.


The stroke has left Thanh with a blood clot in her brain, and she often experiences nightmares and hallucinations due to the hemorrhaging that she suffered. In the chapter, Mai and her best friend, Bobbie, are...

In the first chapter of Monkey Bridge, Mai is at Arlington Hospital in Virginia, three years after leaving Saigon. The year is 1978, and Mai's mother, Thanh, is recuperating from a stroke; Thanh is a patient at the hospital.


The stroke has left Thanh with a blood clot in her brain, and she often experiences nightmares and hallucinations due to the hemorrhaging that she suffered. In the chapter, Mai and her best friend, Bobbie, are visiting with Thanh. Although Thanh is making a slow but steady recovery, Mai is distressed that her mother often calls out for her father, Baba Quan, in her sleep.


Thanh and Baba Quan were supposed to meet at a rendezvous point on the 30th of April in 1975, where a car was to take them to an American plane. However, Baba Quan never appeared, and Thanh had been forced to leave for America without him. Mai knows that her mother still grieves for the father she left behind, so she resolves that she and Bobbie won't rest until they find a way to bring her grandfather to America.

What are a few quotes from Marcus Zusak's The Book Thief that prove that words and books help grow Max and Liesel's relationship?

Liesel and Hans were practicing reading in the basement before Max arrived.  Reading was very important to Liesel.  It was her escape from the war.  She made a dictionary out of the walls.  After Max arrived, Liesel associated him with reading too, and the two of them formed a relationship around words.


When Max first arrives, Liesel is fascinated by him.  She does not quite know what to do, because she knows that his presence...

Liesel and Hans were practicing reading in the basement before Max arrived.  Reading was very important to Liesel.  It was her escape from the war.  She made a dictionary out of the walls.  After Max arrived, Liesel associated him with reading too, and the two of them formed a relationship around words.


When Max first arrives, Liesel is fascinated by him.  She does not quite know what to do, because she knows that his presence puts them in danger.  She feels bad for him because he has been relegated to the basement by Germany’s ridiculous policies against Jews.


Liesel is also fascinated because in addition to showing up unexpectedly, Max showed up with a book.  The book was Mein Kampf, Hitler’s book explaining his “struggle.”  Liesel tries to ask Max about it.



He looked up from the pages, forming his fingers into a fist and then flattening them back out. Sweeping away the anger, he smiled at her. He lifted the feathery fringe and dumped it toward his eyes. “It’s the best book ever.” Looking at Papa, then back at the girl. “It saved my life.” (Ch. 31)



The book was Max’s cover, and that is why he says that it saved his life.  He does not mean that the actual book is a good book.  Its contents are terrible and he hates Hitler.  It is another example of the irony of books.  Hitler certainly would not have expected his book to be used by a Jew to escape capture.


Max uses it to make something better, The Standover Man.  He paints over the pages.  This is a very meaningful gift for Liesel.  It is personal and celebrates their friendship.



The scrawled words of practice stood magnificently on the wall by the stairs, jagged and childlike and sweet. They looked on as both the hidden Jew and the girl slept, hand to shoulder. (Ch. 32)



Liesel realizes that Max is not so much frightened as appreciative of the family and what they do for him, including Liesel.  He loves words as much as she does.  When he asks Liesel to describe the world outside, she gets creative and he really admires the creativity.  Their friendship is built around the joy of words.



“The sky is blue today, Max, and there is a big long cloud, and it’s stretched out, like a rope. At the end of it, the sun is like a yellow hole ….” (Ch. 37)



These weather reports make Max feel like he is part of the real world.  They are gifts of words passed from Liesel to Max.   These and the little nonsense gifts that Liesel brings with them make Max feel less alone.

What life lesson in Bleachers by John Grisham is relevant today?

A relevant life lesson from Bleachers is that a coach should teach their players to be more than wins and losses.


Coach Rake was responsible for tremendous success. This is seen in his win-loss record, unmatched number of championships, and the way he transformed football in Messina. His intensity translated to his players, some of whom credit the coach with their being able to face down life's challenges.


However, it is clear that a number...

A relevant life lesson from Bleachers is that a coach should teach their players to be more than wins and losses.


Coach Rake was responsible for tremendous success. This is seen in his win-loss record, unmatched number of championships, and the way he transformed football in Messina. His intensity translated to his players, some of whom credit the coach with their being able to face down life's challenges.


However, it is clear that a number of his players were damaged through Coach Rake's approach to the game. Coach Rake valued success on the field more than anything else. As a result, he created a system where his players struggled to understand the demands of life away from it:



You count the years until you get a varsity jersey, then you're a hero, an idol, a cocky bastard because in this town you can do no wrong. You win and win and you're the king of your own little world, then poof, it's gone. You play your last game and everybody cries. You can't believe it's over. Then another team comes right behind you and you're forgotten.



Neely enhances this when he wishes that he "never saw a football." Coach Rake encouraged a system that shielded athletes from the reality of the world. They embraced his singular focus on football. This entitlement helped make some of them unable to fully cope with the reality of life when their time on the gridiron had passed. Coach Rake defined his players' lives in terms of success in football being the only metric that mattered. Even if only one player suffers from this condition, it means that Coach Rake failed his athletes. The dangers of this metric are evident in how Coach Rake's methods led to Scotty Reardon's death. Such an instance immediately provokes reevaluation of Coach Rake's approach.


I think that this emphasis on the game being more important than life outside of it is where we see Coach Rake as myopic. The role of a coach should transcend their sport. Their purpose is to lead. Especially in youth sports, a coach should use the game to teach lessons about life. Wins and losses are important. However, the coach's true responsibility is to prepare their athletes for life outside of the game. When Paul says that "another team comes right behind you and you're forgotten," it is an indictment of the world that Coach Rake created. Nothing can justify a coach whose players feel left behind or incapable of dealing with the world that awaits them once their playing days are done. Little can justify the death of a child under a coach's watch. Recognizing the limitations of Coach Rake's worldview is a very relevant life lesson from Bleachers.


In a world where so much of youth sports hinges on wins and losses, a life lesson from Bleachers is that there has to be more. Coaches must recognize that their job is to make athletes better people. Coaches must remind their athletes that no matter what happens on the field of play, they will be loved and that their job is to take that love with them into the outside world. Their ultimate job is to ensure that the young people they take under their wing become better people first and improved athletes second.

A small dust particle of mass `7.90 * 10^-6 g` is being observed under a magnifying lens. Its position is determined to within `0.0050 mm.` (`1 y =...

Hello!


A. The main physical law to use here is the uncertainty principle with respect to momentum and position. The formula is


`Delta p*Delta x gt=` ħ/2,


where `Delta p` is an uncertainty in a momentum, `Delta x` is an uncertainty in a position of the same particle, and Ä§ is the reduced Planck's constant, `h/(2 pi).`  It is obvious that `Delta p = m*Delta v,` where `m` is a mass of a particle and `Delta...

Hello!


A. The main physical law to use here is the uncertainty principle with respect to momentum and position. The formula is


`Delta p*Delta x gt=` ħ/2,


where `Delta p` is an uncertainty in a momentum, `Delta x` is an uncertainty in a position of the same particle, and Ä§ is the reduced Planck's constant, `h/(2 pi).`  It is obvious that `Delta p = m*Delta v,` where `m` is a mass of a particle and `Delta v` is an uncertainty in its speed.


Therefore the minimum uncertainty in a velocity is  `h/(4 pi)*1/(m*Delta x).`


All values are given, but we have to make m from mm and kg from g. The numerical answer is


`((6.626*10^(-34))/(4 pi))/(7.9*10^(-6)*10^(-3)*0.0050*10^(-3)) approx 6.626/(7.9*5*4*3.14) * 10^(-34)/10^(-15) approx`


`approx 0.0133*10^(-19) = 1.333*10^(-21) (m/s).`


Thus I agree with your answer. I don't even have an idea where 4.6 may come from.



B. A time is a distance divided by a speed, the only problem is to use correct units. A time in seconds is  `10^(-3)/(1.33*10^(-21)) approx 0.75*10^(18) (s).` To get this time in years we have to divide it by the given number of seconds in a year, i.e. `(0.75*10^(18))/(3.156*10^7) approx 0.238*10^(11) = 2.38*10^(10) (years).`


If we would use the speed that stated as the "correct answer" for A, the answer would be that you want as "correct" for B.

How does Sandburg defend Chicago in the poem "Chicago"?

In the second stanza of "Chicago," Sandburg lists the insults that have been aimed at Chicago, including that it is wicked, crooked, and brutal. While he admits that these qualities are true of Chicago, he defends the city by saying that it is also vital, clever, and strong. He refers to Chicago as a "tall bold slugger set vivid against the little soft cities." It is a city that is constantly building and rebuilding, and...

In the second stanza of "Chicago," Sandburg lists the insults that have been aimed at Chicago, including that it is wicked, crooked, and brutal. While he admits that these qualities are true of Chicago, he defends the city by saying that it is also vital, clever, and strong. He refers to Chicago as a "tall bold slugger set vivid against the little soft cities." It is a city that is constantly building and rebuilding, and it has the kind of liveliness and energy that the smaller cities around it don't have. The city is like a callow youth that laughs. As Sandburg writes, Chicago is "laughing even as an ignorant fighter laughs who has never lost a battle." It has a kind of brashness because the city is proud to offer so much to the rest of the country. As Sandburg writes, Chicago plays many roles, including those of "Hog Butcher, Tool Maker, Stacker of Wheat, Player with Railroads and Freight Handler to the Nation." So, while what people say to vilify the city might be true, Chicago is also a proud producer of many goods and services that the rest of the nation needs.

What is a character sketch of Old Bryson in "One Thousand Dollars" by O. Henry?

Old Bryson is one of the middle-aged men who frequents the gentlemen's club to which "Young Gillian" also belongs. Below, I listed different character traits and explanations of why he fits those descriptions.

  • Anti-social

Bryson's temperament is that of a curmudgeon. For, besides generally desiring to retreat from others with a book, Old Bryson seems uninterested in those around him and appears to be a person of fixed ideas. In short, Old Bryson is a misanthrope and a cynic.


  • Disinterested in others

So, when Gillian enters the club and approaches Bryson, who is well sequestered from the other men, Old Bryson "sighed, laid down his book and took off his glasses," knowing Gillian will force him into conversation. Gillian tells Bryson he has a funny story to relate. Bryson's only reply is that he wishes Gillian would relate it to someone in the billiard room, where the other men of the club are congregated.



"You know how I hate your stories."
"This is a better one than usual," said Gillian...It's too sad to go with the rattling of billiard balls. I've just come from my late uncle's law firm of legal corsairs."



Gillian tells Old Bryson that his uncle has left him $1,000 and he must spend it. Bryson observes "the late Septimus Gillian was worth something like half a million." Gillian tells Bryson that his uncle left most to science and the rest to other people who worked for him. Gillian then asks Bryson what he should do with this $1,000.


  • Condescending

With one thousand dollars, Old Bryson tells Gillian dryly that one man could buy a home, while another might choose to send his wife to a warm climate to heal. He continues his air of superiority until Gillian stops him.



"People might like you, Old Bryson," said Gillian, almost unruffled, "if you wouldn't moralize. I asked you to tell me what I could do with a thousand dollars."



Clearly, Bryson enjoys taunting Gillian. Now, he says sarcastically as he laughs dismissively,



Why, Bobby Gillian, there's only one logical thing you could do. You can go buy Miss Lotta Luriere a diamond pendant with the money, and then take yourself off to Idaho and inflict your presence upon a ranch. I advise a sheep ranch, as I have a particular dislike for sheep.



Since it is obvious that Old Bryson wants Gillian to leave him, Gillian thanks him, saying Bryson has hit upon "the very scheme." He tells Bryson he always knew he could "depend upon" him. Gillian leaves in a cab.

How would you justify the frog's actions in the poem "The Frog and the Nightingale" by Vikram Seth?

Before the nightingale arrives in the bog, the frog is the only voice in "The Frog and the Nightingale" by Vikram Seth. Nothing "Stilled the frog's determination / To display his heart's elation." When the nightingale arrives, the frog is immediately replaced by her beautiful voice. In order to manipulate the nightingale into wearing out her voice (and, sadly, dying), the frog uses flattery. While this strategy may or may not be justified, it is...

Before the nightingale arrives in the bog, the frog is the only voice in "The Frog and the Nightingale" by Vikram Seth. Nothing "Stilled the frog's determination / To display his heart's elation." When the nightingale arrives, the frog is immediately replaced by her beautiful voice. In order to manipulate the nightingale into wearing out her voice (and, sadly, dying), the frog uses flattery. While this strategy may or may not be justified, it is certainly very savvy of the frog to praise the nightingale so she will do what he wants. The nightingale is "greatly flattered and impressed" that the frog praises her, so she allows him to change her song. The nightingale sings longer than she should, as she's impressed "with a breathless, titled crowd." The crowd that gathers to hear her sing is from the nobility, so she keeps singing, flattered by the attention of important people, even when she shouldn't. When the nightingale dies from singing too much, the frog says she was "Far too prone to influence. / Well, poor bird - she should have known / That your song must be your own." Even though the frog's actions were cruel, the nightingale fell prey to being his victim because she was vain. She should have just accepted that her song was short but sweet. 

In Okay for Now, how do the main characters change throughout the book?

From the beginning to the end of Okay for Now, the main character Doug and most of his family have changed significantly. Doug begins the story as a rather shy young man who feels stifled by his abusive father and brother. As the story progresses, Doug takes on more responsibility and makes more social connections, bringing him out of his shell. Mr. Powell helps Doug learn to express himself through drawing, while Miss Cowper...

From the beginning to the end of Okay for Now, the main character Doug and most of his family have changed significantly. Doug begins the story as a rather shy young man who feels stifled by his abusive father and brother. As the story progresses, Doug takes on more responsibility and makes more social connections, bringing him out of his shell. Mr. Powell helps Doug learn to express himself through drawing, while Miss Cowper and Mr. Ferris help him learn to read. Through this process, Doug's communication skills improve both literally and figuratively as he finds his voice through reading. By the end of the story, Doug has become a confident teenager who, as the principal says, can "go wherever he wants to go."


Doug's brothers, Christopher and Lucas, change significantly throughout the story as well. Lucas begins the story as an abusive young man who leaves his family to go to war. After being maimed in action, Lucas returns home broken, bitter and disillusioned. Through Doug's intervention and a friendship with the school's gym teacher, Lucas finds his way in the world and realizes the potential he thought was lost after his injuries.


Christopher also undergoes a significant change as the story evolves. While he was often cold and sometimes cruel to his younger brother at the beginning of the story, being accused of theft humbles Christopher. He realizes that Doug is there for him when no one else is and slowly but surely becomes a brother who can be relied upon for support.


Each one of the Swieteck brothers changes throughout Okay For Now in his own way. Although Doug's transformation is the most dramatic, it has ripple effects on the lives of his family members and everyone around him. By the end of the story, the reader is left with the sense that all of the main characters really will be okay.

What are some examples of symbolism in The Book Thief by Markus Zusak?

A symbol is an object or person that stands for something other than itself.  I will give you an example of an object and a person.  An example of symbolism in the story is the books that Liesel steals, and the act of reading itself, which both represent freedom and escape.  Liesel finds herself in a very difficult situation. She has lost both of her parents, and her brother.  She lives in a country and...

A symbol is an object or person that stands for something other than itself.  I will give you an example of an object and a person.  An example of symbolism in the story is the books that Liesel steals, and the act of reading itself, which both represent freedom and escape.  Liesel finds herself in a very difficult situation. She has lost both of her parents, and her brother.  She lives in a country and a time ravaged by war.  Liesel is unable to read when she steals her first book, but she uses it to learn.  Books become her salvation.



When she came to write her story, she would wonder exactly when the books and the words started to mean not just something, but everything. (Ch. 3)



To Liesel, reading is more than a pleasurable pastime.  Books are very valuable to her.  This is why she steals them, because she doesn’t have access to them. The very act of stealing them is a symbolic act of self-expression.  It demonstrates the crushing nature of Nazi Germany and how small acts of expression can make a difference.


Another symbol in the story is Jesse Owens, the Olympian.  Rudy is obsessed with Jesse Owens because he is impressed with his physical feats.  As a boy, Rudy appreciates that Owens can run.  Race does not matter.



Even the most racist Germans were amazed with the efforts of Owens, and word of his feat slipped through the cracks. No one was more impressed than Rudy Steiner. (Ch. 5)



His father tries to explain to him that Owens is unpopular in Germany because of his race.  Jesse Owens thus becomes a powerful symbol of the disconnect between what Germany values (race) and what it should value (achievement).  These are just two examples of symbols in a book full of symbols.

How would the change in attitude toward smoking over the last 50 years be viewed through the three analytical perspectives? (conflict,...

The pervasive attitude toward smoking and smokers has definitely shifted over the last 50 years, from favorable (or at least neutral) to unfavorable. Each of the dominant three theoretical perspectives has a different way of interpreting this shift.


A conflict theorist would view the change in attitudes towards smoking as a means of controlling supply, thereby keeping common goods out of the reach of the underclass. As taxes are piled on cigarettes and new legislation...

The pervasive attitude toward smoking and smokers has definitely shifted over the last 50 years, from favorable (or at least neutral) to unfavorable. Each of the dominant three theoretical perspectives has a different way of interpreting this shift.


A conflict theorist would view the change in attitudes towards smoking as a means of controlling supply, thereby keeping common goods out of the reach of the underclass. As taxes are piled on cigarettes and new legislation promotes fines for smokers, those in the underclass are forced to either quit smoking -- a solution conflict theorists would view as paternalistic -- or spend money they do not have to afford goods that are marked up at a higher percentage than other retail goods.


A functionalist would view the change in attitudes towards smoking as a means of generating revenue. States, counties, cities, and townships have been able to fund projects through raising taxes on cigarettes, and levying fines on smokers. Functionalists would also likely view the reduction in smoking across most demographics as a natural ebb of the marketplace, one that another good or service will fill.


A symbolic interactionist would view the change in attitudes towards smoking as a meaningful change in attitudes regarding personal health. Though 50 years ago the science around smoking was already grim, advertising executives aided the general public in viewing smoking as sexy, macho/feminine, cool, fun behavior. After large settlements by the tobacco industry, science linking cigarettes to cancer, and the removal of cigarette ads from television, smokers and smoking are viewed as unhealthy and in need of intervention.  

What are some examples of how every lesson that Helen was taught by her teacher was set amidst the beauty and magnificence of nature in Chapter 7...

Before Anne Sullivan arrived, Helen Keller was trapped in a world of darkness.  Unable to see and hear since she was a baby, little Helen struggled to make others understand her.  A regular school was impossible with her condition, and she lived too far from the school for the blind. 


Her parents did not want to send her away, so they hired a tutor.  Since a tutor has some flexibility, because it is not a...

Before Anne Sullivan arrived, Helen Keller was trapped in a world of darkness.  Unable to see and hear since she was a baby, little Helen struggled to make others understand her.  A regular school was impossible with her condition, and she lived too far from the school for the blind. 


Her parents did not want to send her away, so they hired a tutor.  Since a tutor has some flexibility, because it is not a school setting, she took Helen outside.  Helen had always enjoyed nature, because she could experience it more fully since it engages the other senses.  Helen said the lessons “seemed more like play than work” because she enjoyed learning language and loved being outdoors. 



We read and studied out of doors, preferring the sunlit woods to the house. All my early lessons have in them the breath of the woods–the fine, resinous odour of pine needles, blended with the perfume of wild grapes. Seated in the gracious shade of a wild tulip tree, I learned to think that everything has a lesson and a suggestion. (Ch. 7)



Helen said that Anne Sullivan had a “peculiar sensitivity” to her desires.  She wanted to make up for all that Helen had lost, and that involved making the lessons as sensory as possible. Helen was intelligent and eager, and she was an extremely fast learner.  Anne Sullivan personalized the lessons to Helen’s personality and interests, and she learned even faster.



Our favourite walk was to Keller's Landing, an old tumble-down lumber-wharf on the Tennessee River, used during the Civil War to land soldiers. There we spent many happy hours and played at learning geography. I built dams of pebbles, made islands and lakes, and dug river-beds, all for fun, and never dreamed that I was learning a lesson. (Ch. 7)



The creativity that Anne Sullivan uses, and the thirst with which Helen learns, result in her being able to engage in regular conversation soon.  Anne Sullivan teaches her the regular subjects, but also language and personal interaction.  She is teaching Helen how to live in the speaking world.

What do the poems "Lake Isle of Innisfree" by William Butler Yeats and "Composed Upon Westminster Bridge" by William Wordsworth have in common?

Both “The Lake Isle of Innisfree” (William Butler Yeats) and “Composed upon Westminster Bridge, September 3, 1802” (William Wordsworth) describe beautiful and peaceful scenes involving water. Yeats longs to go to the island of Innisfree in Ireland, and he thinks about what it would be like to live there. In contrast, Wordsworth describes the skyline of London as he sees it himself from a bridge that crosses the River Thames. Yeats uses his imagination to...

Both “The Lake Isle of Innisfree” (William Butler Yeats) and “Composed upon Westminster Bridge, September 3, 1802” (William Wordsworth) describe beautiful and peaceful scenes involving water. Yeats longs to go to the island of Innisfree in Ireland, and he thinks about what it would be like to live there. In contrast, Wordsworth describes the skyline of London as he sees it himself from a bridge that crosses the River Thames. Yeats uses his imagination to put himself into a remote place. He would be alone. Wordsworth looks at a large city in the early morning, before most people are awake. It won’t be long before the bridge will be bustling with bodies and traffic. Yeats uses more senses here than Wordsworth does. He notes the differences in light; but he also mentions the sounds of the bees and the water lapping gently. Wordsworth concentrates on the way the morning light shines on the buildings. Both poets find beauty in these places, even though they are opposites as landscapes. And both find a connection to the universe here – “the deep heart’s core” and “that mighty heart” – that they can feel pulsing beneath them. Both men are tuned in to what goes on around them, no matter where they are.


Structurally, the two poems are quite different. “Innisfree” has three stanzas that each follow an ABAB rhyme scheme. “Westminster Bridge” is a sonnet of 14 lines with a rhyme scheme of ABBAABBACDCDCD.

In The Merchant of Venice, how is Christian hypocrisy evident in Portia's call for mercy?

Portia’s famed speech, in which she argues for mercy for Antonio, may appear to be the height of decency; yet it unmistakably disregards Shylock’s Judaism and, later, proves to be hypocritical.


Portia begins her speech by stating that:



The quality of mercy is not strain'd,


It droppeth, as the gentle rain from heaven



Her argument is set in a Christian context—mercy is handed down from heaven—and yet she disregards that Judaism views mercy differently, as something to be atoned for. Furthermore, Shylock’s own policy of usurance, in which he collects interest on money borrowed, indicates Shylock’s worldview: he does not believe in something for nothing. Such an idea of mercy must appear alien to him. One might imagine that in attempting to persuade Shylock to have mercy, she ignores his own moral and religious positions and substitutes her own; however, this seems at odds with Portia’s cleverness. Ignorance cannot be denied, but it seems more likely that she is appealing not to Shylock, but to the Christians in the audience, who are predisposed to accept her argument. The Duke, in particular, has stated that mercy is warranted:



How shalt thou hope for mercy, rendering none?



Portia’s argument is calibrated to appeal to the high-class Christians in the courtroom: in short, nearly everyone but Shylock. She claims that:



'Tis mightiest in the mightiest; [mercy] becomes


The throned monarch better than his crown;


His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,


The attribute to awe and majesty,


Wherein doth sit the dread and fear of kings;


But mercy is above this sceptred sway,


It is enthroned in the hearts of kings,


It is an attribute to God himself



In essence, she argues that mercy demonstrates power better than symbols such as a crown. While such a thing might be true for one born into power, Portia disregards the evident fact that not all are born into circumstances in which a crown and sceptre are provided as a birthright: such advice is useless to Shylock. Shylock’s power has come from everything but mercy; mercy would undoubtedly ruin his position as a moneylender should he engage in it frequently. Portia’s argument, thus far, strikes at the principles that Shylock has built his life and livelihood upon, with only the vague promise of mercy in return.



Portia portrays mercy as superior to justice near the end of her speech:



Though justice be thy plea, consider this—


That in the course of justice, none of us


Should see salvation: we do pray for mercy;


And that same prayer, doth teach us all to render


The deeds of mercy.



Salvation cannot be found through justice, as she claims: mercy is the only way through which to attain it. In essence, Portia argues in a court of law that law is of less importance than religious principles that Shylock does not share. And for all of her talk of mercy and compassion, Portia shows Shylock none: she refers to him as “Jew” repeatedly, exposing the hypocritical nature of her speech—she will show mercy only when it dovetails with her own interests.



In keeping with Shylock’s policy of quoting the bond literally, Portia finds a solution for Antonio: Shylock may take his pound of flesh, but cannot shed blood in doing so. With Shylock unable to claim his redemption, Portia has the perfect opportunity to practice the mercy that she has preached—and yet, she states:



The Jew shall have all justice;—soft;—no haste;—


He shall have nothing but the penalty.



True to her word, she refuses him the principal—the amount of money that he lent Antonio, with no interest—and reminds the court that a would-be murderer of a Venetian citizen would have half of their goods given to the citizen and the other half seized by the state. She then mocks him, advising Shylock to “beg mercy of the duke.” Antonio offers some semblance of justice by allowing Shylock to keep part of his fortune, on two conditions: that he recognizes Lorenzo as his heir, and converts to Christianity.



Shylock’s Judaism, a subject of derision for Portia and the other Venetians, is no longer an issue: he has been forced against his will to convert. Yet he is still distrusted and reviled, for all that; his estate has been forcibly divided up and his binding principles proven untrustworthy even in a court of law. Mercy has been denied him, in nearly every way, and thus the hypocrisy in Portia’s speech is shown.

The setting of "Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?" is 1960s America. Do you think the story still speaks to women today?

Although the answer to this question will be an opinion, not a fact, the reality is that this story is often anthologized, assigned, and discussed even today, which lends credence to the idea that, yes, it still speaks to women.


(Readers should note that Oates's story, as well as the discussion below, touches on themes that are controversial and violent. This content is inappropriate for children.)


Consider a few of the themes of the story...

Although the answer to this question will be an opinion, not a fact, the reality is that this story is often anthologized, assigned, and discussed even today, which lends credence to the idea that, yes, it still speaks to women.


(Readers should note that Oates's story, as well as the discussion below, touches on themes that are controversial and violent. This content is inappropriate for children.)


Consider a few of the themes of the story and why they're still highly relevant right now:


1. Popular culture, especially movies and songs, commands young women to expect certain things when it comes to romance, relationships, and sex. Look no further than Facebook or Reddit right now to confirm that this problem remains rampant. Popular articles shared daily among women have titles like "Thirty Lies Disney Told Me about Love." Like Connie in the story, women today still struggle to sort out romantic and sexual realities from the expectations ingrained in us through popular culture.


2. There's a fine line between flirtation and dominance, and both involve a power play that can become frightening. Seduction, or attempts at seduction, can lead to violence and murder. This theme is familiar to modern women, and so the story has value in the warning it offers. The staggering popularity of songs that glorify sexual violence, like Katy Perry's "E. T. (featuring Kanye West)" or Robin Thicke's "Blurred Lines," as well as novels that do likewise, such as Fifty Shades of Grey, causes general concern that even today, as a society, we're too willing to accept (or even be enthralled by) the idea that men should seduce, dominate, and own women. Right now, you can pull up a news site like CNN.com or any popular blog and find evidence of our ongoing struggle against "rape culture." And it's not just the United States experiencing this struggle: look to Aziz Ansari's new book Modern Romance for a detailed discussion of how Brazilian women today deal with their culture's acceptance of, even celebration of, the kind of physical expressions of flirtation that people in other countries call sexual harassment and even sexual assault.


3. Evil takes different forms and is present in any society at any time. Consider Arnold Friend from the story, the would-be rapist, and note how he's basically the devil in a poorly disguised human form. This aspect of the story reminds women today that for all the advancements society has made in human rights and in women's rights, we can't lapse into complacency if we want to maintain our morals and our safety or keep moving forward toward gender equality. Look to Malala Yousafzai's I Am Malala, for example, for a discussion of how some people today still struggle to keep women uneducated and isolated "for their own protection"--a current, real, poorly disguised evil intention.


So, yes: For people around the world who share Malala's vision of education and equality for women, and for women who care about combating rape culture in the popular media, Oates's story still speaks to us.

How does Poe's "The Raven" reflect the era in which it was written?

There are several ways in which the poem reflects its period. The first is that the setting points to a fairly limited chronological range. A poor student who nonetheless could afford many books is something only possible a few centuries after the invention of the printing press. Lamplight and velvet cushions suggest technology and decor typical of the nineteenth century. 


Next, the use of the pathetic fallacy, in which the external weather echoes the mood...

There are several ways in which the poem reflects its period. The first is that the setting points to a fairly limited chronological range. A poor student who nonetheless could afford many books is something only possible a few centuries after the invention of the printing press. Lamplight and velvet cushions suggest technology and decor typical of the nineteenth century. 


Next, the use of the pathetic fallacy, in which the external weather echoes the mood of the narrator is something typical of Romantic and Victorian poets as is the intensely melancholic tone and use of a poor, depressed, sensitive student as a narrator. The protagonist, as is typical of nineteenth century writing, is not an heroic figure, but an outsider distinguished by a superior degree of taste and sentiment rather than by wealth, bravery, or strength as one might have found in earlier poetry.


The metrical experimentation and intense musicality are also typical of the period. Trochaic octameter is an unusual choice of meter, but Poe, like Tennyson and other mid-nineteenth century poets used unusual meter and frequent assonance and alliteration to create a dreamlike and emotionally charged atmosphere.

What is one of the great ironies of the Civil War?

One of the greatest ironies of the Civil War is that no one died during the first battle of the war, the shelling of Fort Sumter. The fort was shelled for 34 hours and no one died on either side. The first casualty of the war was when a cannon exploded during the surrender ceremony, killing a young private. This ironic bit of history is sad when one considers that this war ultimately killed more...

One of the greatest ironies of the Civil War is that no one died during the first battle of the war, the shelling of Fort Sumter. The fort was shelled for 34 hours and no one died on either side. The first casualty of the war was when a cannon exploded during the surrender ceremony, killing a young private. This ironic bit of history is sad when one considers that this war ultimately killed more than six hundred thousand people over four years.  


Another ironic part of the war is how many family members ended up on opposite sides. Mary Todd Lincoln, Abraham Lincoln's wife, lost two brothers who were in the Confederate army. These family breakups were not uncommon, as people had to decide between loyalty to their state and loyalty to their nation, especially in the South.  

What are four examples of how your observations of the behavior of others are relevant to or demonstrate concepts in social psychology?

Here are four examples of concepts related to social psychology using the behavior of others and yourself:

  1. Observations of yourself: How do you define your own self-concept? Do you define yourself as belonging to certain groups or categories? Thinking about the concept of the "categorical self," what categories do you belong to (such as a student, or gender, racial, ethnic, or other categories)? Using the concept of self-esteem, would you rate yourself as having high self-esteem if you are confident and do not care about others' conceptions of you, or do you have low self-esteem and feel that your conception of yourself is based on the appreciation of others?

  2. Observations of another person: Perhaps you've observed examples of discrimination or prejudice, which are concepts in social psychology. For example, do some of your teachers or professors speak about girls or women not being interested or capable at math or science? That is an example of stereotyping. You may have experienced other examples related to race, gender, class background, ethnicity, or other variables.

  3. Observations of other people: Have you seen examples of stereotype threats? That means that people in a group that has experienced stereotypes are in fear of confirming or validating that stereotype. For example, a girl may be afraid to perform poorly on a math test, making her more anxious and less likely to perform well, because she is afraid of confirming that girls are bad at math.

  4. Observations of other people: Perhaps you've observed that people use attribution theory in different ways. They may look at students who don't do well on a test and attribute internal or external reasons for different students. For example, perhaps a boy didn't do well on a math test simply because he didn't receive a fair test (external attribution), while a girl (or a member of another group) didn't do well because she isn't good at math (internal attribution). 

In Three Men in a Boat by Jerome, what happened during the incident of the narrator's visit to the library where he consulted a medical book?

The section of the story that this question is referring to can be found in the early parts of chapter one. J, the narrator, begins this chapter by telling readers that he, George, and Harris were all sitting around talking about their general poor health.


We were sitting in my room, smoking, and talking about how bad we were—bad from a medical point of view I mean, of course.


I'm sure the smoking has something...

The section of the story that this question is referring to can be found in the early parts of chapter one. J, the narrator, begins this chapter by telling readers that he, George, and Harris were all sitting around talking about their general poor health.



We were sitting in my room, smoking, and talking about how bad we were—bad from a medical point of view I mean, of course.



I'm sure the smoking has something to do with their general lack of feeling great.


J. then specifically tells readers that his liver was "out of order." He was recently able to read up on a pill that fixes liver issues, and he states that he had each and every symptom listed for a bad liver.



I knew it was my liver that was out of order, because I had just been reading a patent liver-pill circular, in which were detailed the various symptoms by which a man could tell when his liver was out of order. I had them all.



The very next paragraph raises reader suspicions about J. and his health. He tells readers that whenever he reads about a particular disorder, he can't help but feel that everything regarding that particular disorder applies exactly to him. It's at this moment that readers can seriously suspect that J. is a hypochondriac.


Next, J. tells readers about a trip that he made to the British Museum "to read up on the treatment for some slight ailment" that he believed that he had. In this particular case, J. believed that he had hay fever. He read up on hay fever, and his suspicions were confirmed. Unfortunately for J., he began to peruse through the rest of the medical book. He read about disease after disease, and he became convinced that he exhibited the signs and symptoms for each disease.


J. believed that he must be a medical marvel, and he reported to his doctor to share the news. The only malady J. did not believe he suffered from was "housemaid's knee."



 "Everything else, however, I have got."



The doctor examined J. and wrote him a prescription for a better diet, more exercise, and less reading about diseases. J. followed the directions, and he miraculously became healthy again.



I followed the directions, with the happy result—speaking for myself—that my life was preserved, and is still going on.


What role did Hiram Johnson, a California progressive, play in the 1912 Republican primary and presidential election?

Hiram Johnson served as a progressive governor of California (first winning office in 1910), and he instituted several election reforms to make the state more democratic, including the initiative, referendum, and recall. He founded the Progressive Party in 1912 and was the vice-presidential candidate that ran with Teddy Roosevelt. This party was nicknamed the Bull Moose Party. The Progressive Party platform of 1912 called for the "Rule of the People," and was "committed to the...

Hiram Johnson served as a progressive governor of California (first winning office in 1910), and he instituted several election reforms to make the state more democratic, including the initiative, referendum, and recall. He founded the Progressive Party in 1912 and was the vice-presidential candidate that ran with Teddy Roosevelt. This party was nicknamed the Bull Moose Party. The Progressive Party platform of 1912 called for the "Rule of the People," and was "committed to the principle of government by a self-controlled democracy expressing its will through representatives of the people." The party also sought to institute an eight-hour work day (as the work day for many industrial workers was much longer), to curtail labor by children, and to establish minimum wages. It won only eight states, including California, in the election, and Woodrow Wilson, the Democrat, was elected. After Teddy Roosevelt died in 1919, Johnson was the assumed leader of the Progressive Party, but he ran in the 1920 presidential election as a Republican. He lost that primary to Warren Harding, another Republican. None of the Republican primary candidates had enough votes, so Harding was chosen as the Presidential candidate in a compromise at the Republican National Convention. 

What is the significance of the title with respect to the short story, "The Lumber Room"?

The title of Saki's short story, "The Lumber Room" is significant because this forbidden room represents the self-appointed aunt's lack of imagination and appreciation for creativity, all of which Nicholas possesses. The boy's ability to find the key and enter into this room represents his victory over his aunt's petty dullness.


After he is punished for his subversive prank of tricking the obtuse aunt about a frog being in his morning bowl of bread-and-milk, Nicholas...

The title of Saki's short story, "The Lumber Room" is significant because this forbidden room represents the self-appointed aunt's lack of imagination and appreciation for creativity, all of which Nicholas possesses. The boy's ability to find the key and enter into this room represents his victory over his aunt's petty dullness.


After he is punished for his subversive prank of tricking the obtuse aunt about a frog being in his morning bowl of bread-and-milk, Nicholas is sentenced to remain home while his boy and girl cousins are afforded the privilege of going to the beach. And, because he is in "disgrace," Nicholas is forbidden entrance into the gooseberry garden. Now, because Nicholas could enter this garden by one of two doors and hide in the "masking growth" of vegetables, the aunt decides that she will have to keep the garden under her surveillance: 



...she spent an hour or two in trivial gardening operations among flower beds and shrubberies, whence she could watch the two doors that led to the forbidden paradise. She was a woman of few ideas, with immense powers of concentration.



While she is thus occupied, Nicholas sneaks off to the lumber room for which he has discovered the key. He opens the door and enters into "an unknown land" filled with artistic items such as a tapestry which tells the story of a hunter and his dogs, who pursue a stag. There several other interesting items are stored, among them a book of delightful pictures of resplendent birds.


After a while, Nicholas hears a shrill cry from his aunt, who has fallen into a water tank in the gooseberry garden. Again, he foils her as she cries for rescue, but he cleverly reminds her that he has been forbidden to enter this garden. So, she must remain in this embarrassing position until a kitchen maid needs vegetables from this garden and hears her cries.


That evening, it is an aunt who sits in "frozen muteness" at supper because the cousins have not enjoyed their day, either. Only the silence of Nicholas contains bemusement as he wonders whether the hunter and his hounds will escape while the wolves devour his wounded stag in the lumber room. 




How do you get rid of radioactive waste?

Radioactive waste disposal involves finding a safe place to store it until it’s no longer radioactive. Different types of waste give different levels of radiation. Radioactive waste disposal is divided into three general categories: low level, intermediate level, and high-level waste. Low-level waste typically has short-lived radioactivity. It does not require cooling nor shielding to handle. An example of this would be a lab coat that has been contaminated by radioactive material. It is disposed...

Radioactive waste disposal involves finding a safe place to store it until it’s no longer radioactive. Different types of waste give different levels of radiation. Radioactive waste disposal is divided into three general categories: low level, intermediate level, and high-level waste. Low-level waste typically has short-lived radioactivity. It does not require cooling nor shielding to handle. An example of this would be a lab coat that has been contaminated by radioactive material. It is disposed of through shallow land burial.


Intermediate-level waste requires shielding to handle but not cooling. An example of this would be metal fuel cladding at a nuclear power plant. This type of waste is stored at a nuclear waste repository. Please note that the United States does not define this category, but other countries do. High-level waste requires both shielding and cooling to handle.  Used nuclear fuel is an example of this. High-level waste is stored in a deep geological repository.


There are other waste categories, but this should be enough to get you started. See the links below for further research.

In the book Hoot, how does the main character contribute to the development of the theme?

Roy Eberhardt is the main character in Hoot. A strong theme in the book is that one should get involved and stand against injustice. Roy contributes to the development of this theme in three important ways.

As the book starts out, when Roy is on the school bus, he sees a barefoot boy running across lawns as the other children are going to school. He is intrigued by the mysterious boy and goes in search of him. When he finds the strange boy living by himself in the woods, he wants to find out more and gives him a pair of his own shoes. He keeps pursuing the mystery boy, despite threats from Beatrice Leep. He stands in sharp contrast to Beatrice's father, who is so uninvolved in his step-son's life that he doesn't even know he has run away from school. Roy is willing to get involved where others aren't. 


Roy also supports the theme of getting involved and standing against injustice when he defies Dana Matherson, the bully. Dana terrorizes new and younger kids on the bus and at school with impunity. No one stood up to him before Roy. He almost chokes Roy, but Roy fights back, breaking Dana's nose. When the school fails to discipline Dana for fear of a lawsuit, Roy takes matters into his own hands and lures Dana into committing a crime, for which Dana is arrested and sent to juvenile detention. When Dana gets locked up, Roy "felt guilty about making up the bogus cigarette story, [but he] also couldn't help but think that putting Dana behind bars was a public service." Again, Roy gets involved where others have let the matter slide, and justice is achieved in the end.


Finally, Roy's attempt to save the owls is an example of how an everyday citizen, even a minor, can get involved in community issues and stand against injustice. Mullet Fingers tries to protect the owls, and instead of brushing the boy off as crazy Roy investigates and learns the owls are protected by law. Roy then attempts to find out whether Mother Paula's has followed the law, and he even goes to city hall to try to look at the company's file. He raises the issue in his history class, which inspires many of his classmates to come out to rally against the groundbreaking. Because of his efforts, the story garners local and then national media attention, and the pancake house company's illegal actions are exposed. By getting involved and taking a stand against injustice, Roy creates positive change in his community and beyond.


Roy demonstrates that ordinary citizens, even teens, can impact society positively when they get involved and take a stand against injustice.

`int (x^2 + 2x + 3)/(x^3 + 3x^2 + 9x) dx` Find the indefinite integral.

 `int (x^2+2x+3)/(x^3+3x^2+9x)dx=`


We will use the following formula: `int (f'(x))/(f(x))dx=ln|f(x)|+C`   


The formula tells us that if we have integral of rational function where the numerator is equal to the derivative of the denominator, then the integral is equal to natural logarithm of the denominator plus some constant. The proof of the formula can be obtained by simply integrating the right-hand side.


Since `(x^3+3x^2+9x)'=3x^2+6x+9=3(x^2+2x+3)`  we will first have to slightly modify the integral in order to...

 `int (x^2+2x+3)/(x^3+3x^2+9x)dx=`


We will use the following formula: `int (f'(x))/(f(x))dx=ln|f(x)|+C`   


The formula tells us that if we have integral of rational function where the numerator is equal to the derivative of the denominator, then the integral is equal to natural logarithm of the denominator plus some constant. The proof of the formula can be obtained by simply integrating the right-hand side.


Since `(x^3+3x^2+9x)'=3x^2+6x+9=3(x^2+2x+3)`  we will first have to slightly modify the integral in order to apply the formula. We will both multiply and divide the integral by 3.


`1/3int (3x^2+6x+9)/(x^3+3x^2+9x)dx=`


Now we apply the formula to obtain the final result.


`1/3ln|x^3+3x^2+9x|+C`


Why is the US concerned about some of the countries around the world? (please give examples)

America's interest in a country usually involves economic or military considerations.


In Iraq, for example, the United States has a strategic military interest. Iraq shares a long border with Iran, a country that has shown significant hostility toward the United States (we've all seen the burning flags and heard the “death to America” chants). As an example of how fluid international relations can be, Iraq's importance has changed since our invasion in 2003. The development...

America's interest in a country usually involves economic or military considerations.


In Iraq, for example, the United States has a strategic military interest. Iraq shares a long border with Iran, a country that has shown significant hostility toward the United States (we've all seen the burning flags and heard the “death to America” chants). As an example of how fluid international relations can be, Iraq's importance has changed since our invasion in 2003. The development and rise of ISIS in Syria and Iraq has made Iraq more important than ever. As long as ISIS can operate as a quasi-state in the Middle East, it can continue to recruit and perpetrate terrorist attacks. A strong Iraq would have made ISIS's territorial gains impossible. So the U.S. continues to support Iraq militarily, and at least one of the reasons is ISIS.


The U.S. also has many economic interests throughout the world. Economies improve with trade with other countries. Robust trade boosts a country's export business while making it possible to import products for which there is a market. To this end, establishing trading partnerships with growing economies can benefit the U.S. economy. Brazil is a good example of an important U.S. trading partner. Most people would probably be surprised to find out that Brazil is the world's seventh largest economy. That's a lot of economic clout. The office of the United States Trade Representative reported the following export statistics:



U.S. goods exports to Brazil in 2015 were $32 billion, down 25% ($11 billion) from 2014 but up 106% from 2005. U.S. exports to Brazil account for 2.1% of overall U.S. exports in 2015.



A lot of U.S. jobs are made possible by this much trade.


The office also reported the following import statistics:



The top import categories (2-digit HS) in 2015 were: mineral fuels ($4.5 billion), aircraft ($3.0 billion), iron and steel ($2.9 billion), special other (articles for repair and returns) ($2.6 billion), and machinery ($1.7 billion).



When this much money and product is changing hands, the economic impact on both countries is significant. For it's own economic well-being, the U.S. has to pay attention to what is going in countries like Brazil. 

Why did Mr. Martin decide he had to "rub out" Ulgine Barrows?

"The Catbird Seat" starts off like a conventional murder story. The author James Thurber wants the reader to expect that Mr. Martin intends to commit a perfect crime. Ulgine Barrows became a "special assistant to the president of the firm, Mr. Fitweiler," where Martin was head of the filing department at F & S. Martin had loathed the woman from the moment he met her. She is loud, vulgar, and incompetent. In the short time she has been with the firm, she has created chaos in some of the departments--and now Martin knows instinctively that she has her eye on his beloved filing department. She obviously thinks it needs streamlining. She is thinking of throwing out a lot of the older files and selling the steel cabinets for scrap. Two comments that reveal her budding intentions are the following:


"Do you really need all these filing cabinets?"



And:



"But you sure have got a lot of fine scrap in here!"



At present she has Mr. Fitweiler's complete confidence, support, and authority. This is why Martin has decided that the only way he can save his department is to kill her. His plan is to make it look as if the man who murdered her in her apartment had to be someone whose character was entirely different from Martin's own well-known ultra-conservative, abstemious, strictly routine behavior. He buys a pack of cigarettes because he is known to be a non-smoker. 



It was his idea to puff a few puffs on a Camel (after the rubbing-out), stub it out in the ashtray holding her lipstick-stained Luckies, and thus drag a small red herring across the trail.



When he gets to her apartment he asks for a Scotch-and-soda because it is well known that he is a non-drinker as well as a non-smoker.


But the story, which seemed to be developing into a fairly standard murder mystery of the perfect-crime sub-genre, suddenly takes a turn. Martin realizes that he isn't a murderer but that he can utilize the contradictions between his clues and his character in another way. The next morning Ulgine Barrows dashes into Fitweilers office to report everything Martin did and everything he told her. Fitweiler can hardly believe his ears. He has known Martin for twenty-two years. Martin tells him:



"I walked home. Then  I went to Schrafft's for dinner. Afterward I walked home again. I went to bed early, sir, and read a magazine for a while. I was asleep before eleven."



While the two men are talking, Ulgine Barrows storms back into the president's office. 



"Is the little rat denying it?" she screamed. "He can't get away with that!....You drank and smoked at my apartment," she bawled at Mr. Martin. "You called Mr. Fitweiler an old windbag and said you were going to blow him up when you got coked to the gills on your heroin!....If you weren't such a drab, ordinary little man," she said, "I'd think you planned it all. Sticking your tongue out, saying you were sitting in the catbird seat, because you thought no one would believe me when I told it! My God, it's really too perfect!"



"Perfect" is really the right term, because Mr. Martin has always been a perfectionist. Ulgine Barrows' temper tantrum and her seemingly wild accusations only confirm Mr. Fitweiler's belief that the woman "has suffered a complete breakdown." He has to call for help to have her forcibly ejected from his office. That is the end of her services at F & S.

What are the problems with Uganda's government?

Youth unemployment and corruption are two problems that face the Ugandan government. Modern governments all over the world face many problem...